˾

Jump to main content

Academic Appeal Procedure

The Academic Appeal Procedure at ˾ is articulated in Board Policy, Title 2, Article 1, Part 2. 

The purpose of the Academic Appeals Process (“AAP”) described below is to provide a means for appealing and resolving disputes concerning an “Academic Decision” (defined as a final course grade or the termination of a student’s program) that the affected student considers “arbitrary,” “capricious,” or a “violation of University policy.”  These terms are defined as follows:
(1) arbitrary: disparate treatment of persons in essentially identical circumstances;
(2) capricious: no discernible relationship between the act or decision complained of and the legitimate interests or considerations affecting or motivating such act or decision; and
(3) violation of University policy: misinterpretations, misapplications, or violations of authorized University policies.

The AAP shall be used by students to appeal actions taken according to standards or practices that are specific to a course, discipline, program, department, school, or college. The AAP may not be used to appeal decisions pursuant to the University’s Student Code of Conduct.

Academic Appeals Board

Chair of the Academic Appeals Board: Robbie Weis (2023-2025)

For Undergraduate Appeals

  • Five Faculty Members appointed by the Faculty Senate
  • Five Undergraduate Students appointed by the Student Senate

For Graduate Appeals

  • Five members of the Graduate Faculty appointed by the Graduate Council
  • Five Graduate Students appointed by the Graduate Student Association