Academic Appeal Procedure
The Academic Appeal Procedure at ˾ is articulated in Board Policy, Title 2, Article 1, Part 2.
The purpose of the Academic Appeals Process (“AAP”) described below is to provide a means for appealing and resolving disputes
concerning an “Academic Decision” (defined as a final course grade or the termination of a student’s program) that
the affected student considers “arbitrary,” “capricious,” or a “violation of University
policy.” These terms are defined as follows:
(1) arbitrary: disparate treatment of persons in essentially identical circumstances;
(2) capricious: no discernible relationship between the act or decision complained of and the legitimate
interests or considerations affecting or motivating such act or decision; and
(3) violation of University policy: misinterpretations, misapplications, or violations of authorized University policies.
The AAP shall be used by students to appeal actions taken according to standards or practices that are specific to a course, discipline, program, department, school, or college. The AAP may not be used to appeal decisions pursuant to the University’s Student Code of Conduct.
Academic Appeals Board
Chair of the Academic Appeals Board: Robbie Weis (2023-2025)
For Undergraduate Appeals
- Five Faculty Members appointed by the Faculty Senate
- Five Undergraduate Students appointed by the Student Senate
For Graduate Appeals
- Five members of the Graduate Faculty appointed by the Graduate Council
- Five Graduate Students appointed by the Graduate Student Association